By Rolo B. Cena
Random
Dumaguete Star Informer
01 January 2017
2017,
while anticipated to be productive for the Philippines and the Filipino people,
may never be so unless 2016 is made an indicator of the country’s performance
in relation to achieving targets planned earlier, New Year’s resolutions
vis-à-vis personal achievements included.
The answers
to the question why most targets or New Year’s resolutions fail should not be
undermined. For one, this speaks of
strategies. Two, it deals with
achievability of targets. Three, it
determines the effectiveness of execution.
Several
leading experts have their own rationale on this: Ram Charan, leadership guru, contends that
seventy percent of strategies are poorly executed. Doctors Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton,
advocates of Balanced Scorecard argue that ninety percent of strategies are
poorly executed. Ernst & Young, management
consultants, reveals that sixty percent of strategies are never executed while
Deloitte, another management expert asserts that the hindrance to achieving
targets is poor execution. These teams conducted
years of research and studies to come up with these game-changing statistics.
Obviously,
these scientific accounts assert that achieving targets depend on how well
companies or individuals execute their strategies, no matter how these
strategies are poetically articulated, as in most cases. One more time, these accounts include New
Year’s resolution.
More
than 30 years ago, Filipinos gathered at EDSA to call for the resignation of the
late Ferdinand Marcos. Organized by the
late Cardinal Sin, it gained support from Fidel Ramos and Juan Ponce Enrile,
two of the prominent stalwarts and allies of Marcos. That catapulted his expulsion from Malacanang
through the help of the American government.
The first lady president, Cory Aquino then governed the greed-adorned
Palace by the murky Marikina River.
Novel
ideas were deliberated and awesome strategies crafted with the help of old,
aspiring and new politicos sans personal interests hidden in the rhetoric of all
recommendations, actions or arguments they laid down on the table of political,
socio-economic and cultural discourses.
We
then thought we could move fast-forward.
Little did we realize that we were actually chugging towards development. The only significant achievement Aquino administration
can boast of is the amendment of the Constitution with uncalled-for re-naming
of edifices and landmarks on the side; Ninoy Aquino International Airport is
one of those.
Fidel
Ramos took over amidst election protests from the camp of Mirriam
Santiago. Joseph Estsrada succeeded
Ramos but was ousted for plunder in less than two years through the less
popular EDSA 2 Revolution that ushered the petite lady of Pampanga to the
Palace, ruling the country for about ten straight years, with a material number
of high-profile graft and corruption cases recorded. Benigno Aquino III, succeeded the Rule from
Gloria Arroyo via his infamous “Tuwid na Daan” vehicle.
Over
time, Malacanang controlled the State: Senate
ruled, Congress banged its gavel unopposed, Supreme Court dissented anytime,
Cabinet obeyed, and local governments submitted. Much was done in favor of the few and
privileged. Individuals disappointed of results
marched down the streets to express their most-of-the-time self-vested
interests, shouted at the top of their voices behind picket lines.
They
argued much; they worked less. Worse,
they delivered the most mediocre of services.
It happened before; it is still happening today!
And
what has become of us after 30 years of EDSA?
Amazingly, EDSA still stands as the most congested highway bringing the
public to several behavioral disorders:
Budgets inflated to accommodate Pork Barrel, crimes increased, graft and
corruption cases ballooned, insurgencies rose, etcetera. An overwhelming lists of crimes, grimes and
slimes more than achievements are exposed daily. Wow!
Lately,
rumors circulated that the opposition is cooking a mega-rally. Allegedly funded by a Fil-Am billionaire, it
is aimed at ousting President Duterte for the following simple reasons: They
hate his firm resolve to kill criminals, jail corrupt government officials, and
renew the face of the Archipelagic Philippines, literally.
EDSA
has become a byword in political arena; it has gained criticisms across the
globe: For one, it marks the historic
feat against tyranny; two, it shows the courage of the Filipino people to
assert their rights; and, three, it gives the impression that Filipinos never
have learned from one failure to another.
I love the first two points but the third sounds intriguing: We never have learned from one failure to
another over time!
Is
another EDSA still worth the effort? If
I may put my two cents in, the answer is no because signs are telling us. We have been accusing each administration for
failing to steer the country to progress but we never realize our failure to
assess how well we responded to every problem, how effective we resolved, how
efficient we managed damages, and how openly we cooperated or openly accepted
proposed changes.
Arguably
though, another EDSA may not be the ultimate solution. Mahatma Gandhi has something better to
offer: “Independence means voluntary
restraints and discipline, voluntary acceptance of the rule of law.”
Aren’t
we are missing the whole point?