By
Rolo B. Cena
Hushed
Poppies
Dumaguete
Star Informer
22
July 2012
Cebu City, Philippines – Engagingly disturbing, the
standoff over Scarborough has been dragging for more than three months now. What is amazingly irritating is the fact that
China stands on its own while the fun-loving country Philippines seeks supports
from other ASEAN member countries. It
even sought political and military support from the United States of America before
briefly browsing the yellow pages of the ASEAN.
The
Shoal, which comes in many names depending on one’s color and race, is believed
to be sitting on huge mineral deposits.
The abundance of maritime life boosts its marketability and makes it a
fertile ground for disputes, or even war, if this process is not accordingly
and humanely addressed to; nestling along the most strategic navigational
highway, it offers access to international trade and can in fact become a good
naval or military support base.
First
off, I still believe it’s better to push for bilateral talks with China instead
of engaging other countries on this issue.
China has been our economic partner for centuries. The trade that transpired between our
countries has contributed to economies, politics, culture, and even social life. To date, thousands of Filipinos, both skilled
and unskilled, are deployed to the mainland and Hong Kong for various economic
engagements. Conversely, we can numerate
Chinese nationals working and hanging around in the country; some are even
deeply engaged in businesses, and to say the worst, involved in drugs-related
crimes and criminalities.
What
China wants to articulate in fact is the same:
bilateral talks that could foster enhanced ties. What they want is economic advantage more
than political domination in the Shoal.
Conversely, the Country wants the same:
economic more than political advantage.
The former sounds feasible while the latter is beyond comprehension; the
imagination only conspirators of the old war-torn Mesopotamia could have wanted
to abort had the ill effects of war aftermath been made known to the fielders.
Second,
involving the US does not mean support at all.
It will place its own interest over the Philippines’. Do you think Uncle Sam will work on the
interests of the Filipinos ahead of theirs?
It would sound too good to be true if they will. History tells us that the US government was
willing to protect Hawaii, Guam, Puerto Rico, Iraq, Afghanistan, et al. But it was more than that; it was actually
protecting their vested economic and socio-political interests in the guise of
protecting these subjects. At the end of
day, the superpower would always win.
Arguably
though, statistics put it that where there is US presence, there is war. Experts should correct me if I am wrong: Americans wanted to protect Iraq from Iran’s
mighty invasion; consequently, the Gulf War ensued. Americans wanted to protect Afghanistan from
the Taliban; consequently, Afghan war was born.
The results: these two most recent wars are not over yet. Fundamentalists bought war in, Americans earned.
Vietnam
is another classic example: No country as
hell to die for! And the Philippines, too!
Third,
rather than exchanging unpleasant hullabaloos, why not grab a chair in a
boardroom of choice and discuss. There
is more than one benefit in talking than in exchanging word war. Reciprocating military actions can always
trigger another major conflict, and insulting diplomatic relations can always
ruin existing ties.
The
art of war has always been the game of the greedy and the powerful! And this standoff, if not managed squarely
may lead to something adverse.
Gentlemen
got but one word: they talk and decide
between ears. Let’s stop trading the
barbs!